Ključne riječi
turtle graphics
polygons
quasi-experiment Logo programski jezik
kornjačina grafika
mnogokuti
kvazi-eksperiment
Kako citirati
Sažetak
Programski jezik Logo jedan je od prvih programskih jezika za poučavanje djece nastao još 1966., a primarno je služio za učenje geometrije. Logo se temelji na ideji kornjačine grafike, koja je i danas još uvijek itekako prisutna u razvijanju računalnog razmišljanja i za početno učenje programiranja. Jasno je da je u vrijeme nastajanja Loga ideja osobnog računala bila tek ideja iz znanstvene fantastike, pa i samog računarstva kao samostalne znanstvene discipline. Unatoč tome, vizionarski pogled Seymoura Paperta postavio je temelje računalnog razmišljanja i poučavanja programiranja od najranije dobi koji su danas sveprisutni. Kako je Papert bio primarno matematičar, s predmetom zanimanja za poučavanje matematike, tako je Logo zapravo nastao u svrhu poučavanje geometrije i olakšavanja djeci savladavanja osnovnih pojmova iz područja geometrije kao što su mnogokuti. Ipak, nema puno istraživanja koja se bave istraživanjem utjecaja Loga na razumijevanje osnovnih pojmova geometrije. Cilj ovog rada je istražiti utjecaj korištenja programskog jezika Logo u poučavanju geometrije koja se obrađuje u osmim razredima osnovne škole, s naglaskom na osnovne pojmove o mnogokutima, identificirati učestale pogreške pri učenju mnogokuta te ocijeniti učinkovitost Logo programa u poticanju interaktivnog učenja geometrije. U ovom istraživanju koristile su se kvalitativne i kvantitativne metode kako bi se pružio sveobuhvatan uvid u ovu temu. Istraživanje je pokazalo da primjena kornjačine grafike u programskom jeziku Logo u poučavanju osnovnih pojmova o mnogokutima rezultira boljim razumijevanjem pojmova mnogokuta kod učenika te potiče interaktivno učenje geometrije.Reference
Bahar, A., & Maker, J. C. (2015). Cognitive Backgrounds of Problem Solving: A Comparison of Open-ended vs. Closed Mathematics Problems. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 1531–1546.
Bailey, M. W. (2005). IronCode: Think-Twice, Code-Once Programming. SIGCSE ’05, 181–185. https://doi.org/10.1145/1047344.1047412
Baykul, Y. (2005). Lköğretimde Matematik Öğretimi. Pegema Yayıncılık.
Bhattacharyya, S. (2021). The Study of Basic Assumptions in Solid Geometry. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Review, 03(11), 1282–1285.
Carlson, M. P., & Bloom, I. (2005). The cyclic nature of problem solving: An emergent multidimensional problem-solving framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 45–75.
Clements, D. (2003). Teaching and learning geometry (pp. 151–178).
French, D. (2004). Teaching and Learning Geometry: Issues and methods in mathematical education. Continuum International Publishing Group.
Gravemeijer, K., Figueiredo, N., Feijs, E., Galen, F. van, Keijzer, R., & Munk, F. (2016). Measurement and Geometry in Upper Primary School. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-746-7
Jablonski, S., & Ludwig, M. (2023). Teaching and Learning of Geometry—A Literature Review on Current Developments in Theory and Practice. Education Sciences, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070682
Jones, K. (2000). Critical issues in the design of the school geometry curriculum. In Readings in Mathematics Education (pp. 75–90). University of Auckland.
Jones, K. (2002). Issues in the teaching and learning of geometry. In Aspects of Teaching Secondary Mathematics: Perspectives on Practice (pp. 121-).
Laurent, M., Crisci, R., Bressoux, P., Chaachoua, H., Nurra, C., De Vries, E., & Tchounikine, P. (2022). Impact of programming on primary mathematics learning. Learning and Instruction, 82, 101667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101667
Maier, P. (2001). How To Make Solid Geometry Solid? https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:167215443
Meelissen, M., Netten, A., Drent, M., Punter, R., Droop, M., & Verhoeven, L. (2012). PIRLS- en TIMSS-2011. Trends in achievement in reading, mathematics and science.
Ministarstvo znanosti i obrazovanja. (2019). Kurikulumi nastavnih predmeta Matematika za osnovne škole i gimnazije i Matematika za srednje strukovne škole na razini 4.2.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Book, Inc.
Riastuti, N., Mardiyana, & Pramudya, I. (2017). Analysis of students geometry skills viewed from spatial intelligence. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1913, 020024.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1983). The Wild, Wild, Wild, Wild, Wild World of Problem Solving (A Review of Sorts). For the Learning of Mathematics, 3(3), 40–47. JSTOR.
Schoevers, E. M., Kroesbergen, E. H., Moerbeek, M., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2022). The relation between creativity and students’ performance on different types of geometrical problems in elementary education. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 54(1), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01315-5
Serin, H. (2018). Perspectives on the Teaching of Geometry: Teaching and Learning Methods. Journal of Education and Training, 5, 1. https://doi.org/10.5296/jet.v5i1.12115
Silva, J. (2024). Geometry teaching from Babylon to the computer era. https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDB/00324/2020)
Solomon, C., Harvey, B., Kahn, K., Lieberman, H., Miller, M. L., Minsky, M., Papert, A., & Silverman, B. (2020). History of Logo. Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages, 4(HOPL), 1–66. https://doi.org/10.1145/3386329
Stein, M., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influence student learning. In Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the national council of teachers of mathematics (pp. 319–369).
van Zanten, M., & van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2018). Opportunity to learn problem solving in Dutch primary school mathematics textbooks. ZDM, 50(5), 827–838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0973-x
Ovaj rad licenciran je pod Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Array