Sažetak
Ovaj članak istražuje potencijalne opasnosti korištenja umjetne inteligencije od strane studenata prilikom pisanja ispita. Iako umjetna inteligencija nudi brojne prednosti u obrazovanju, njezina zloupotreba može dovesti do smanjenja akademske iskrenosti, smanjenja kvalitete obrazovanja i stvaranja nejednakosti među studentima. Kroz analizu problema i izazova te već provedenih istraživanja članak naglašava važnost postavljanja jasnih smjernica i pravila kako bi se osigurala pravedna i transparentna upotreba umjetne inteligencije u akademskom okruženju. To se može postići također upotrebom umjetne inteligencije.Reference
Bommarito, M. J., Katz, D. M. (2023). GPT Takes the Bar Exam. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4314839
Cotton, D., Cotton, P., Shipway, R (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Cu, M. A., Hochman, S. (2023). Scores of Stanford students used ChatGPT on final exams, survey suggests. Preuzeto s https://stanforddaily.com/2023/01/22/scores-of-stanford-students-used-chatgpt-on-final-exams-survey-suggests/
Gill, S. S., Xu, M., Patros, P. et al. (2023). Transformative effects of ChatGPT on modern education: Emerging Era of AI Chatbots. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 4 (2023), 19-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.06.002
Kasneci E., Sessler K., Küchemann S., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education, Learning and Individual Differences, 103 (2023), 102274. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
McCarthy, J., Minsky, M. L., Rochester, N., Shannon, C. E. (2006). A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence, August 31, 1955. AI Magazine, 27(4), 12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v27i4.1904
Mills, J., Abdelaal, E., Walpita, S. (2019). Artificial Intelligence Is a Tool for Cheating Academic Integrity. Preuzeto s https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337894173_Artificial_Intelligence_Is_a_Tool_for_Cheating_Academic_Integrity
Marcus, G., Davis, E. (2020). GPT-3, Bloviator: OpenAI’s language generator has no idea what it’s talking about. Preuzeto s https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/08/22/1007539/gpt3-openai-language-generator-artificial-intelligence-ai-opinion/
Rahman, M. M., Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT za obrazovanje i istraživanje: Mogućnosti, prijetnje i strategije. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 5783. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095783.
Raji, I., Scheureman, M., Amironesei, R. (2021). You Can't Sit With Us: Exclusionary Pedagogy in AI Ethics Education. U FAccT '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (str. 515-525). ACM Digital Library. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445914
Ryznar, M. (2023). Exams in the Time of ChatGPT. Washington and Lee Law Review Online, 80(5), 305-322. Preuzeto s https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr-online/vol80/iss5/3
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023
Susnjak, T. (2022). "ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity?"ArXiv. https://ar5iv.org/pdf/2212.09292.pdf
Williamson, B., Eynon, R. (2020). Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223-235. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1798995
Ovaj rad licenciran je pod Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Array