Abstract
Robotics is a multidisciplinary field that has increasingly entered the field of education in the last ten years. However, its application in primary schools is still at a low level. The research in this paper was made with the aim of elucidating the problems in the use of robotics within the subject of Informatics and analysing the degree of interest of teachers in the implementation of the LEGO WeDo 2.0 educational program in the first grades of elementary school. The research was conducted among 70 teachers of the Informatics subject in elementary schools in the city of Zagreb. The research cycle had three phases, and an online questionnaire was used as a research instrument. At the beginning, the research participants answered the questions from the first part of the questionnaire, and then they were subjected to an online presentation that contained a description of the LEGO WeDo 2.0 programming interface and a proposal for a robotics curriculum for first-grade elementary school students and how to implement it in the Informatics subject. After listening to the presentation, the participants proceeded to fill out the second part of the questionnaire, i.e. the assessment of LEGO WeDo 2.0 robotics education. The results show that personal attitudes about the possibilities of using robotics in teaching changed after watching the presentation, teachers showed a high level of readiness to implement and use the LEGO WeDo educational program in teaching materials for the first grades of elementary school. As the biggest advantages of the educational program, they recognized the raising of digital and IT literacy among students, the stimulation of critical thinking and interest in STEM disciplines, and they see the biggest limitation in the high costs of purchasing robot sets. Limitations also stem from some personal factors.References
Alimisis, D. (2013). Educational robotics: open questions and new challenges. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 6(1), 63-71.
Benčak, N., Oreški, P. (2022). Educational Robots in Primary Education. 2. međunarodna znanstvena i umjetnička konferencija Učiteljskoga fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu Suvremene teme u odgoju i obrazovanju – STOO2 - in memoriam prof. emer. dr. sc. Milanu Matijeviću, Zagreb, Hrvatska. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366465724_Educational_Robots_in_Primary_Education/link/63a2df88ca6a9d254f908dd7/download
Bers, M.U. (2008). Blocks to robots: Learning with technology in the early childhood classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Blanchard, S., Freiman, V., Lirrete-Pitre, N. (2010). Strategies used by elementary schoolchildren solving robotics-based complex tasks: innovative potential of technology. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2851-2857.
Blikstein, P. (2013). Digital fabrication and ’making’ in education: The democratization of invention. In: J. WalterHerrmann, C. Bόching (Eds.), FabLabs: Of Machines, Makers and Inventors (pp. 1-21). Bielefeld: Transcript Publishers.
Carbonaro, M., Rex, M., Chambers, J. (2004). Using LEGO robotics in a project-based learning environment. Interactive Multimedia Electronic. Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning, 6(1), 1-19.
Crnković, B. (2018). Robotika i STEM: Budućnost u obrazovanju. Motrišta - časopis za kulturu, znanost i društvena pitanja, 2018(103/104), 85-98.
Croatian Makers (2023). About us – IRM. croatian makers.hr. Retrieved from https://croatianmakers.hr/en/home/
Demetriou, D. (May, 2009). Robot teacher conducts first class in Tokyo school. The Telegraph. Retrieved from https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/5311151/Robot-teacher-conducts-first-class-in-Tokyo-school.html
DeJarnette, J.K. (2012). Implementing STEM in the Early Childhood Clasroom. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(3), 1-9.
Detsikas, N. i Alimisis, D. (2011). Status and trends in educational robotics worldwide with special consideration of educational experiences from Greek schools. In: D. Bezakova, I. Kalas (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Informatics in Schools: Situation, Evolution and Perspectives (pp. 1-12). Bratislava: Comenius University.
Engelhardt, K.G., Edwards, R.A. (1992). Human robot integration for service robotics. U: M. Rahimi, W. Karwowki (Eds.), Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 315-346.). London: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
Fadel, C. (2008). 21st Century Skills: How can you prepare students for the new Global Economy? Paris: OECD/CERI. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/site/educeri21st/40756908.pdf
Gupta, A.K., Arora, S.K., Westcott, J.R. (2013). Industrial Automation and Robotics. Dulles, VA: Mercury Learning and Information Llc.
International Federation of Robotics- IFR (2021). The World Robotics 2021 - Service Robots. Retrieved from https://ifr.org/img//worldrobotics/Definitions_WR_Service_Robots_2021.pdf
Javaid, J., Haleem, A., Singh, R.P. i Suman, R. (2021). Substantial capabilities of robotics in enhancing industry 4.0 implementation. Cognitive Robotics, 1, 58-75.
Kaplan, F. (2005). Everyday robotics: robots as everyday objects. In: sOc-EUSAI '05: Proceedings of the 2005 joint conference on Smart objects and ambient intelligence: innovative context-aware services: usages and technologies. Grenoble, France, pp. 59-64.
Katehi, L., Pearson, G., Feder, M. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
Klassner, F. i Anderson, S. (2002). LEGO MindStorms: Not just for K–12 anymore. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 10(12), 12-18.
LEGO Education (2020). How Lego Education Became Pioneers o Steam Learning. Retrieved from https://futurumcareers.com/LEGO_Education.pdf
Litinas, A. i Alimisis, D. (2013). Planning, implementation and evaluation of lab activities using robotic technology for teaching the phenomenon of motion. In: A. Ladias, A. Mikropoulos, C. Panagiotakopoulos (...) A. Chalkidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Pan-Hellenic Conference ''Integration and Use of ICT in Educational Process''. Piraeus: HAICTE & University of Piraeus.
Madill, H., Campbell, R.G., Cullen, D.M. (...) Coffin, W.L. (2007). Developing career commitment in STEM-related fields: Myth versus reality. In: R.J. Burke, M.C. Mattis i E. Elgar (Eds.), Women and minorities in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Upping the numbers (pp. 210 – 244). Northampton MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Metz, S.S. (2007). Attracting the engineering of 2020 today. In: R. Burke i M. Mattis (Eds.), Women and minorities in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Upping the numbers (pp. 184–209). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
MZO (2018). Kurikulum nastavnog predmeta Informatika za osnovne škole i gimnazije. Zagreb: Ministarstvo znanosti i obrazovanja. Retrieved from https://mzo.gov.hr/UserDocsImages/dokumenti/Publikacije/Predmetni/Kurikulum%20nastavnog%20predmeta%20Informatika%20za%20osnovne%20skole%20i%20gimnazije.pdf
Nikolić, G. (2016). Robotska edukacija: ''Robotska pismenost'' ante portas? Andragoški glasnik: Glasilo Hrvatskog andragoškog društva, 20(1-2), 25-57.
Nikolić, G. (2021). Promjene značenja pojma robot u proteklih 100 godina. Hrvatski ogranak Međunarodnog vijeća za velike elektroenergetske sustave – Cigre; 10. simpozij: Povijest i filozofija tehnike Zagreb, 23. – 25. studenoga 2021, pp. 1-18. Retrieved from https://hro-cigre.hr/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Nikolic-Transformacija-pojma-robot.pdf
OECD (2019). OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030: OECD Learning Compass 2030- A Series of Concept Notes. Paris: OECD. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-learning/learning/learning-compass-2030/OECD_Learning_Compass_2030_
Concept_Note_Series.pdf
Paluch, S., Wirtz, J. i Kunz, W.H. (2020). Service Robots and the Future of Service. In: Bruhn, M., Kirchgeorg, M. i Burmann, C. (Eds.), Marketing Weiterdenken – Zukunftspfade für eine marktorientierte Unternehmensführung (pp. 423-435.). 2nd ed. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler-Verlag.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Pellegrino, J.W., Hilton, M. L. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://hewlett.org/wp-conte
nt/uploads/2016/08/Education_for_Life_and_Work.pdf
Robot Institute of America (1982). Robot Institute of America Worldwide Robotics Survey and Directory. Dearborn, MI: Society of Manufacturing Engineers.
Rogers, C., Portsmore, M. (2004). Bringing engineering to elementary school. Journal of STEM Education, 5(3-4), 17-28.
Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
Sullivan, A., Bers, M.U. (2015). Robotics in the early childhood classroom: learning outcomes from an 8-week robotics curriculum in pre-kindergarten through second grade. International Journal of Technology and Design Educaion, 26(1), 3-20.
Sullivan, F.R., Moriarty, M. A. (2009). Robotics and discovery learning: pedagogical beliefs, teacher practice, and technology integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(1), 109-142.
Thales Group (2023). Singapore: Worlds smartest city. Retrieved from https://www.thalesgroup.com/en/worldwide-digital-identity-and-security/iot/magazine/singapore-w
orlds-smartest-city
The LEGO Group (2016). LEGO Education WeDo 2.0. Toolbox. Retrieved from https://education.lego.com/v3/assets/b
lt293eea581807678a/blt79d3f743530ca50c/5f880438c3d3c30be7c15228/toolbox-en-gb-v1.pdf
The LEGO Group (2018). Coding Express: Teachers Guide. Retrieved from https://le-www-live-s.legocdn.com/sc/media/files/support/preschool/coding%20express/20180221v1_45002_ps_coding-express_teacher-guide-url_video_enus-a30a6dc995e3781ae35a610f9d65aba3.pdf
Wilson, M. (2015). Implementation of Robot Systems: An introduction to robotics, automation, and successful systems integration in manufacturing. London: Elsevier Inc.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Array