Analysis of primary school students' preferences towards future career development in technology and engineering
PDF (Hrvatski)

Keywords

Informatics
career aspirations
attitudes and interests of students
Technical Culture
technology and engineering informatika
karijerne težnje
stavovi i interesi učenika
tehnička kultura
tehnika i tehnologija

How to Cite

Purković, D. (2022). Analysis of primary school students’ preferences towards future career development in technology and engineering. Polytechnica, 6(2), 8-17. https://doi.org/10.36978/cte.6.2.1

Abstract

The needs and demands of the labour market indicate a shortage of many occupations, among which there are often different profiles in the field of engineering and technology. Since children should be encouraged and directed towards such professions already in elementary school, it is certain that their attitudes and interests can be influenced by school education. Therefore, in this paper, an investigation and analysis of students' attitudes and interests towards career development in the field of engineering and technology was conducted. The study was conducted on a stratified sample (N = 2155) of primary school students. The analysis includes gender and age differences in their direct interest, attitudes toward occupations, experience levels, and career aspirations. The t-test and one-way ANOVA with Scheffé post-hoc tests were used to analyse the collected data. The results show that they are very interested in activities related to engineering and technology and that they understand the reasons for choosing a career in this field. However, there are significant gender and age differences in their own aspirations and perceptions regarding these occupations, as well as in their experiences. At the same time, girls are significantly less interested in careers, experiences and activities in technology compared to boys. Although students in lower grades are more interested in engineering and technology, they are less likely to pursue activities, jobs, and careers in this field compared to students in higher grades. These findings point to the need to adapt content and activities to appeal equally to girls and boys, including changing pedagogical approaches, teaching styles, and more investigation and design activities in the classroom. Age adaptation requires changes in curriculum implementation, particularly in computer science instruction, more meaningful hands-on activities, investigation, and integrated activities, and more time for such activities in the primary school curriculum.
https://doi.org/10.36978/cte.6.2.1
PDF (Hrvatski)

References

Ardies, J, De Maeyer, S., Gijbels, D. (2013). Reconstructing the Pupils Attitude Towards Technology-survey. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 18(1). https://ojs.lboro.ac.uk/DATE/article/view/1796. (12. 05. 2018).

Ardies, J., De Maeyer, S., Gijbels, D. (2015a). A longitudinal study on boys’ and girls’ career aspirations and interest in technology. Research in Science & Technology Education, 33(3), 366-386.

Ardies, J., De Maeyer, S., Gijbels, D. (2015b). The effect of classroom activities on students’ interest and career aspirations towards technology. Australasian journal of technology education, doi: 10.15663/ajte.v2i1.30.

Barlex, D. (2015). Developing a technology curriculum. u P. Williams, A. Jones, C. Buntting (ur.), The Future of Technology Education, Contemporary Issues in Technology Education (143–167). Singapore: Springer, doi:10.1007/978-981-287-170-1.

Benson, C. (2009). Design and technology: A ‘New’ subject for the English National Curriculum. u A. T. Jones, M. J. de Vries (ur.), International Handbook of Research and Development in Technology Education (17–30). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, doi: 10.1163/9789087908799_004.

Chikasanda, V., Williams, J., Otrel-Cass, K., Jones, A. (2011). Students’ perceptions towards technology (PATT): A professional development tool for technology teachers. Pupils Attitude Towards Technology - 25 Conference: Perspectives on Learning in Design and Technology Education. London, 1-5.07.2011, (105-112): Goldsmiths, University of London.

de Vries, M. J. (2009). The developing field of technology education: An introduction. In A. T. Jones, & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (1–9). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, doi: 10.1163/9789087908799_002

Fadigan, K. A., Hammrich, P. L. (2004). A longitudinal study of the educational and career trajectories of female participants of an urban informal science education program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(8), 835-860, doi: 10.1002/tea.20026

Green, R. (2011). D&T Manifesto. Warwickshire, UK: The Design and Technology Association.

Labudde, P., Herzog, W., Neuenschwander, M., Violi, E., Gerber, C. (2000). Girls and physics: Teaching and learning strategies tested by classroom interventions in grade 11. International Journal of Science Education, 22(2), 143–157.

May, B., K., Wendt, J. L., Barthlow, M. J. (2022). A comparison of students’ interest in STEM across science standard types. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6 (1), 2022, 100287, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100287.

MZOS (2006). Nastavni plan i program za osnovnu školu. http://public.mzos.hr (23.11.2011.)

MZOŠ (2011), Nacionalni okvirni kurikulum za predškolsko obrazovanje te opće obvezno i srednjoškolsko obrazovanje. Zagreb: MZOŠ, ISBN 978-953-6569-76-2.

NN 22/2018 (2018). Odluka o donošenju kurikuluma za nastavni predmet Informatike za osnovne škole i gimnazije u Republici Hrvatskoj. https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/201 8_03_22_436.html (21.02.2020).

NN 7/2019 (2019). Odluka o donošenju kurikuluma za nastavni predmet Tehničke kulture za osnovne škole u Republici Hrvatskoj. https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2019_01_7_161.html (21.02.2020).

OECD (2020). Education at a Glance 2020: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing, doi: 10.1787/69096873-en.

OECD/European Commission (2021). The Missing Entrepreneurs 2021: Policies for Inclusive Entrepreneurship and Self-Employment. Paris: OECD Publishing, doi:10.1787/71b7a9bb-en.

Purković, D., Suman, D., Jelaska, I. (2020). Age and gender differences between pupils’ preferences in teaching general and compulsory technology education in Croatia. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 17, 234, 19 doi:10.1007/s10798-020-09586-x.

Purković, D., Delač, D., Kovačević, S. (2022). Interesi učenika osnovne škole za izbornu nastavu tehničke kulture i školske aktivnosti u Hrvatskoj. Metodički ogledi, 29 (1), 167-189 doi: 10.21464/mo.29.1.6.

Purković, D., Kovačević, S. Runko Luttenberger, L. (2022). Attitudes of Croatian Pupils on the relationship of Environmental Issues and Sustainable Development with Technology and Engineering. International journal of technology and design education, doi: 10.1007/s10798-022-09779-6.

Roberts, T., Jackson, C., Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., Bush, S. B., Maiorca, M. C., Schroeder, D. C., Delaney, A., Putnam, L., Cremeans, C. (2018). Students’ perceptions of STEM learning after participating in a summer informal learning experience. IJ STEM Ed, 5, 35 (2018), doi: 10.1186/s40594-018-0133-4.

Sanders, J., Koch, J., Urso, J. (1997). Gender equity: Sources and resources for education students. Mexico City, Mexico: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Shroyer, G., Backe, K., Powell, J. (1995). Developing a science curriculum that addresses the learning preferences of male and female middle level students. Reston, VA: National Association for Research in Science Teaching.

Suman, D., Purković, D. (2018). Preferencije učenika kao polazište za organizaciju i strukturiranje nastave općeg tehničkog odgoja i obrazovanja. Politehnika, 2 (2), 29-42 doi: 10.36978/cte.2.2.03.

Tomperi, P., Kvivesen, M. Manshadi, S., Uteng, S., Shestova, Y., Lyash, O., Lazareva, I., Lyash, A. A. (2022). Investigation of STEM Subject and Career Aspirations of Lower Secondary School Students in the North Calotte Region of Finland, Norway, and Russia. Educ. Sci. 2022, 12, 192, doi: 10.3390/educsci12030192.

Wills, L. (2001). When science is strangely alluring: Interrogating the masculinist and heteronormative nature of primary school science. Gender and Education, 13(3), 261-274.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Array