Abstract
The development of each country's economy is closely linked to the development of technology and technical education. Technological and engineering knowledge is characterized by diversity and highly unpredictable development dynamics. Therefore, this area of learning and teaching is subject to change and harmonization with the dynamics of technology development and the problems of successfully achieving the goals of teaching. In order to neutralize these problems, contextual approaches to learning and teaching, such as project-based learning, need to be implemented in modern teaching. This paper elaborates on such implementation within the curriculum of the subject Technical Culture. A model of contextual learning and student development was used as a template for implementation. In this sense, project teaching and learning occupy a central place in the curriculum, during which most learning outcomes are achieved. The paper also provides an example of implementation for 8th grade, which can make it easier for teachers and practitioners to operationalize their own curriculum. At the same time, the teacher remains the main creator and moderator of teaching, where it is important to set certain restrictions for students, anticipate suggestions for solving problems and guide students to the successful completion of activities. Nevertheless, the real effect of applying this approach on student achievement will be possible to evaluate only if it comes to life in real teaching practice, which is expected in the near future.References
Berns, R. G., Erickson, P. M. (2001). Contextual Teaching and Learning: Preparing Students for the New Economy. The Highlight Zone: Research © Work No. 5. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ ED452376.pdf
Bezjak, J. (2009). Contemporary forms of pedagogic – PUB – BJ. Klagenfurt: LVM.
Black, J., B., McClintock, R., O. (1995). An Interpretation Construction Approach to Constructivist Design. U: B. Wilson (ur.), Constructivist learning environments. Englewood Clifs, NJ: Education Technology Publications.
Bratko, D. Ljubin, T., Matijević, M. (2000) Učenička evaluacija kurikuluma "Aktivna/efikasna škola". Napredak, 141 (2000), 2; 156-169.
CORD (1999). Teaching Science Contextually: The Cornerstone of Tech Prep. USA, Waco: CORD Communications, Inc.
Crawford, M., L. (2001). Teaching Contextually: Research, Rationale, and Techniques for Improving Student Motivation and Achievement in Mathematics and Science. Waco: CORD.
Frost, A., A. (2014). Synthesis of Knowledge Management Failure Factors, http://www.knowledge-management-tools.net/failure.html (14.12.2016.)
Jukić, T. (2010). Odnos kurikuluma i nastavnog plana i programa. Pedagogijska istraživanja, Vol. 7 (1), 55-64.
Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: a review of the literature. Improving schools, 19 (3). 267-277.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Lipika, G., Pooja A., Rajnish, S., Madhu C., (2014). Project based Learning - an Enhanced Approach for Learning in Engineering, Proceedings of the International Conference on Transformations in Engineering Education ICTIEE 2014, Natarajan, R. (Ed.), Springer, 2015 (ISBN 978-81-322-1931-6).
Milat, J. (1996). Tehnička kultura bitna je odrednica sustava obrazovanja. Društvena istraživanja, 1(21), 109-128.
Milat, J. (2005) Pedagoške paradigme izrade kurikuluma. Pedagogijska istraživanja, 2(2), 199-208.
MZOŠ (2006). Nastavni plan i program za osnovnu školu. 304-309, https://www.azoo.hr/(20.7.2020.)
NN 7/2019. Odluka o donošenju kurikuluma za nastavni predmet Tehničkekulture za osnovne škole u Republici Hrvatskoj (22.1.2019.)
Prince, M. J., Felder, R. M., (2006). Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods, Definitions and Research Bases, Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123-138.
Purković, D. (2016) Elementi kontekstualnog pristupa učenju i poučavanju kao čimbenici uspješnosti nastave Tehničke kulture. Doktorski rad. Split: Sveučilište u Splitu, Prirodoslovno-matematički fakultet.
Purković, D., Bezjak, J., (2015). Kontekstualni pristup učenju i poučavanju u nastavi temeljnog tehničkog odgoja i obrazovanja, Školski vjesnik, 64(2015),1, 131-152.
Purković, D. (2015). Realiteti tehničke kulture. Rijeka, Filozofski fakultet Sveučilišta u Rijeci.
Purković, D. (2018). Conceptualization of technology as a curriculum framework of technology education. In I. Milicevic (Ed.), Proceedings TIE 2018 (pp. 3–11). Čačak: University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Technical Sciences.
Purković, D., Kovačević S. (2020). Hierarchical structure of the importance of teaching context in general technology education. Knowledge – International Journal, 40 (2020), 2, 317-325.
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation.
Visković, I. (2016). Projektna nastava kao područje unaprijeđenja kvalitete škole. Školski vjesnik: časopis za pedagogijsku teoriju i praksu, Vol. 65, Tematski broj, 381-391.
Verbitsky, A., A., Kalashnikov, V., G. (2012). Category of „Context“ and Contextual Approach in Psychology. Psychology in Russia, State of the Art, 5, 117-130.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2020 Array