Abstract
This article deals with the potential dangers of using artificial intelligence in writing exams. Although artificial intelligence offers numerous benefits in education, its misuse can lead to a decrease in academic honesty, a reduction in the quality of education and the creation of inequality among students. By analyzing problems and challenges as well as research already conducted, the article emphasizes the importance of establishing clear guidelines and rules to ensure the fair and transparent use of artificial intelligence in the academic environment. This can also be achieved through the use of artificial intelligence.References
Bommarito, M. J., Katz, D. M. (2023). GPT Takes the Bar Exam. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4314839
Cotton, D., Cotton, P., Shipway, R (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Cu, M. A., Hochman, S. (2023). Scores of Stanford students used ChatGPT on final exams, survey suggests. Preuzeto s https://stanforddaily.com/2023/01/22/scores-of-stanford-students-used-chatgpt-on-final-exams-survey-suggests/
Gill, S. S., Xu, M., Patros, P. et al. (2023). Transformative effects of ChatGPT on modern education: Emerging Era of AI Chatbots. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 4 (2023), 19-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.06.002
Kasneci E., Sessler K., Küchemann S., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education, Learning and Individual Differences, 103 (2023), 102274. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
McCarthy, J., Minsky, M. L., Rochester, N., Shannon, C. E. (2006). A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence, August 31, 1955. AI Magazine, 27(4), 12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v27i4.1904
Mills, J., Abdelaal, E., Walpita, S. (2019). Artificial Intelligence Is a Tool for Cheating Academic Integrity. Preuzeto s https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337894173_Artificial_Intelligence_Is_a_Tool_for_Cheating_Academic_Integrity
Marcus, G., Davis, E. (2020). GPT-3, Bloviator: OpenAI’s language generator has no idea what it’s talking about. Preuzeto s https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/08/22/1007539/gpt3-openai-language-generator-artificial-intelligence-ai-opinion/
Rahman, M. M., Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT za obrazovanje i istraživanje: Mogućnosti, prijetnje i strategije. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 5783. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095783.
Raji, I., Scheureman, M., Amironesei, R. (2021). You Can't Sit With Us: Exclusionary Pedagogy in AI Ethics Education. U FAccT '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (str. 515-525). ACM Digital Library. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445914
Ryznar, M. (2023). Exams in the Time of ChatGPT. Washington and Lee Law Review Online, 80(5), 305-322. Preuzeto s https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr-online/vol80/iss5/3
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023
Susnjak, T. (2022). "ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity?"ArXiv. https://ar5iv.org/pdf/2212.09292.pdf
Williamson, B., Eynon, R. (2020). Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223-235. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1798995
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Array